Ellura Sanctuary, Swan Reach, SA, 5354
                      
NB: Only Orthoptera (Crickets, Grasshoppers & Katydids) are shown here. Plant hoppers, etc. are under Hemiptera on the "Beetles, Cockroaches & True Bugs" page.
Stat'
Notes
Thumbnails: 603.   70 native species (0 introduced) listed, with 58 natives (0 introduced) from Ellura
Animals (Animalia) - Jointed Legs (Arthropoda) - Insects (Insecta) - Crickets, Grasshoppers & Katydids (Orthoptera) - Short-horned Grasshopper (Caelifera: Acrididae); 35 species, 29 from Ellura
Australian Aiolopus Grasshopper
Aiolopus thalassinus ssp dubius


iNaturalist
Na
e m
Thank you Robert Read for confirming the id of this species for us

1st Record in SA on Atlas:
~22mm long. Blue back leg "calves", distinctive white stripe on the forewings.
Thanks to Robert for also letting us know it was a male.
Imaged 2 in Jan
🔍Male, dorsal
🔍Male, profile
🔍Male, Rear Legs
🔍Male, Face
🔍Male, Prosternal process
Striped Grasshopper
Apotropis vittata


iNaturalist
Na
e m r
Thank you Robert Read & Matthew Connors for confirming the id of this species for us

Females are ~26-29mm long; Females: S2 was 26mm, S4 27mm & S5 28mm. The one male we measured was ~17mm long.
Inside leg/thigh & tibia are dark grey, almost black.
Body colours are variable, the quantity of photo's here is to present some of the variation of colour forms.
Imaged 5(1M,3F) in Mar(1F), Oct(3:1M,1F) & Nov(1F)
🔍Female, S1, dorsal
🔍Female, S2, dorsal
🔍Male, S3, dorsal
🔍Female, S4, dorsal
🔍Female, S5, dorsal
🔍Female, S2, profile
🔍Male, S3, profile
🔍Female, S4, profile
🔍Female, S5, profile
🔍Male, S3, Antennae
🔍Female, S5, Fastigium
🔍Female, S5, Pronotum in profile
🔍Female, S4, Prosternal process
🔍Female, S5, Prosternal process
🔍Female, S2, Inside Hindleg Colour
🔍Female, S4, Inside Hindleg Colour
🔍Female, S5, Inside Hindleg Colour
🔍Female, S4, Inside Hindleg & Foot Colour
🔍Female, S5, Hind Tibia Colour
🔍Female, S5, Face
🔍Female, S2, Posterior
Spur-throated Locust
Austracris guttulosa


iNaturalist
Na
e m
Thank you Matthew Connors & Dean (SauceGandhi) for confirming the id of this species for us

The Female we caught & measured at Ellura was small for a female, ~55mm tip to tail & ~110mm wingspan.
Imaged 5(1M,1F) in Mar(2), Apr(2:1F) & May(1M)
Instar
Adult
Adult
Adult
🔍Female, dorsal
🔍Female, released, dorsal
🔍Female, profile
🔍Female, Throat Spur
🔍Female, Pronotum Outline
🔍Female, Pronotum Punctuations
🔍Female, Face
🔍Female, posterior
Southern Austroicetes
Austroicetes frater


iNaturalist
Na
e m a
Thank you Robert Read & Dr Michael Kearney for confirming the id of this species for us

Their red legs, eyes protruding above the head slightly & the profile shape of the pronotum are distinctive for this species.
As you can see, their colour is quite variable.
The last one had a missing leg, which shows the body well. This is a regular occurance with grasshoppers.
This highlights how we flip images so the head is to the left to help compare different species.
Robert Read indicated on iNaturalist that all Austroicetes sp have a type of cross or 'X' mark on the pronotum. If this is missing, it's indicates the specimen is not Austroicetes.
Michael said "Apparently this species is always found under trees"
Imaged 10(2M,4F,1J) in Jan(4:2M,1F), Feb(2), Mar(1F), Aug(1J) & Nov(2F)
S4, male, dorsal
S1, profile
S4, male, profile
S1, Red Leg
S4, male, Pronotum & Body
S4, male, Face
S4, male, ventral
Crusty Grasshopper
Caperrala sp


iNaturalist
Na
e m
Other Common NameCommon Wrinkled-headed Grasshopper

Thank you Robert Read & Matthew Connors for identifying this species for us

~30mm long. Purple hind legs.
Imaged 7(3F) in Mar(1F), Apr(1), May(2), Oct(1) & Nov(2F)
🔍S2, Female, profile
🔍S3, Female, profile
🔍S5, profile
🔍S3, Female, Pronotum
🔍S3, Female, posterior
🔍S6, Female, dorsal
🔍S6, Female, profile
🔍S6, Female, Pronotum, dorsal
🔍S6, Female, Pronotum, profile
🔍S6, Female, Spur
🔍S6, Female, Rear Leg Colour
🔍S6, Female, Rear Inside Leg Colour
Australian Plague Locust
Chortoicetes terminifera


iNaturalist
Na
e m a f
Thank you Robert Read, Matthew Connors & Thomas Mesaglio for confirming the id of this species for us

~30mm long. Males are smaller than females
Very variable in colour ranging from vivid green to pale brown to black. While the colours vary, the patterns of the wings and on the hind legs are always the same. The rear legs are also red.
Notice the stripe on top of the head to the pronotum isn't diagnostic (as it appears on the male but not the female that are mating).
The black "patch" seen on the rear tip of the closed wings helps to quickly separate these from other similar grasshoppers. The "cross" on the back, previously used to separate these, is also found on similar grasshoppers, eg Austroicetes sp.
It seems when they contact another of their species every 30 seconds they go into a mating frenzy, causing plaguing; which we'e seen in May & Nov. There must be good conditions for them to start with to encounter so many others in such a short time frame.
Imaged 22(2M,5F,4J) in Jan(1), Mar(2:1M,1F), Apr(1M), May(2), Sep(1), Oct(7:1F,2J), Nov(5:1F,2J) & Dec(3:2F)
🔍Greenish Adult, dorsal
🔍Greenish Adult, profile
🔍Greenish Adult, Head
🔍Greenish Adult, Hind Leg
Brown Adult, profile
🔍Brown Adults, Mating
🔍Hindwing
🔍Forewing
Early Instar
Instar
5th Instar
🔍Plaguing, 24 specimens flying
🔍Plaguing, countless sitting
Bark-mimicking Grasshopper
Coryphistes ruricola


iNaturalist
Na
e m a r
Similar Species: Strong-horned Grasshopper (Retuspia validicornis)
Thank you Matthew Connors & David Muirhead for confirming the id of this species for us

These are a large grasshopper, but we have only managed to capture one adult, yesterday, to measure.
The adult was ~31mm, with juveniles range from 21mm-31mm.
There is a near identical species, Adreppus fallax, which seems to have shorter wings. This is not normally a reliable characteristic to separate out grasshopper species. We will update this page as we learn more.
These have very distinctive antennae, being wide at the bottom narrowing to the tip. The segment lengths are very irregular.
Colours vary dramatically from grey through various shades of brown with or without dark/black banding on the sides. As can be seen, they camouflage very well and are difficult to find unless the move.
The inside legs are very colourful, starting with a blue splash at the hip joint, through maroon with or without white lateral dashes on the thigh, finalising in lavendar to purple shins & feet. To see these colours it's best to try and get your subject to climb something; it then stretches it's hind legs out and the colours become apparant. Typically the inside thigh is dark and looks black to the naked eye outside.
Imaged 31(22J) in Jan(1), Mar(1), Apr(1J), May(3J), Aug(6J), Sep(10:8J), Oct(5:4J), Nov(2) & Dec(2)
🔍S10, Adult, dorsal
S4, Adult, profile
🔍S10, Adult, profile
S4, Adult, close up
S10, Adult, Head profile
🔍S10, Adult, Rear Inside Leg Colour
🔍S10, Adult, Rear Inside Hip Colour
🔍S10, Adult, Camouflage
S5, Juvi, dorsal
S6, Juvi, dorsal
S7, Juvi, dorsal
S8, Juvi, dorsal
🔍S9, Juvi, dorsal
S6, Juvi, profile
S11, Juvi, profile
S3, Juvi, anterior
S6, Juvi, Fastigium
S6, Juvi, Antenna
🔍S9, Juvi, Rear Inside Leg & Hip
S5, Juvi, ventral
S6, Juvi, ventral
S10, Adult, Ventral
Green-lichen Stonehopper
Cratilopus sp ES01


iNaturalist
Na
e m
Thank you Ethan Beaver & Matthew Connors for confirming the id of this species for us

S1 is the only specimen we've captured & measured, ~25mm long.
While they look very similar S2 has some minor differences. It's possible these variations are due to gender, age, environment or different species. In particular, notice the different markings on the pronotum; possibly also a juvenile.
We believe S3 is a juvenile due to it's small size, short antennae (which are darker at the tips) & separated wing buds. It's other markings are the same as 9 of our sightings, except S2.
Imaged 16(1M,1F,9J) in Mar(1J), Jul(2:1J), Aug(4:2J), Sep(6:1M,1F,2J), Oct(2J) & Nov(1J)
S1, Dorsal
S1, Abdomen
S1, Anterior
S1, Inside Leg
S1, Head
S1, Ventral
🔍S2, Dorsal
S2, Profile
S3, Juvenile
Riverina Stonehopper
Cratilopus sp ES02


iNaturalist
Na
e m
Thank you Ethan Beaver for identifying and Robert Read & Matthew Connors for confirming the id of this species for us

It's not possible to identify these down to species; as such they could all be the same species, or each a different one. The are 4 different species listed under Cratilopus on the ALA.
They are abundant on Ellura.
They are flightless and, due to the one pair we found mating, are able to prove the adults are wingless. While difficult to see, it does seem the adults have two separated/overlapping wing stubs, per side, not one hiding the other. Also note the different sized wing stubs.
Imaged 31(4M,26F,11J) in Mar(2:1F), Jun(1F), Jul(1F), Aug(4:4F,4J), Sep(13:2M,11F,5J), Oct(9:2M,7F,2J) & Nov(1F)
🔍
🔍
🔍
🔍
🔍
🔍Mating
🔍
🔍
🔍
🔍
🔍
Striped Stonehopper
Cratilopus sp ES03


iNaturalist
Na
e m
Thank you Robert Read & Matthew Connors for identifying and Ethan Beaver for helping with the id of this species for us

After we found the 1st female we photographed here, Marie then found a pair copulating. Always useful to have the pair that are the same species to compare against the books.
We then posted photo's of this pair on iNaturalist where Matthew & Robert analsysed the images.
Matthew said "Cratilopus on the basis of wing length and prosternal process." "Transverse prosternal process in both sexes, short wings, female about twice the length of the male."
While Matthew indicated Catrilopus sp 1 was a strong consideration, he indicated the "shape of the pronotal margin is a little different". Comparing to C. sp 1, Robert said "Male furcula not as broadly separated. Cercus seems longer."
Until these are formally described we don't really have any diagnostics to go by.
Imaged 12(3M,7F,2J) in Aug(3:2F,1J), Sep(5:1M,3F,1J), Oct(2:1M,1F) & Nov(2:1M,1F)
S1, Female, dorsal
🔍S1, Female, Close up
S2, Female, dorsal
S2, Female, profile
S2, Female, Face
S2, Female, Leg Colour
S3, Male, dorsal
S3, Male, profile
S3, Male, Face
S3, Male, Leg Colour, above
S3, Male, Leg Colour, under
S2 & S3, Size Comparison
S2, Female, ventral
S3, Male, ventral
Orange-lichen Stonehopper
Cratilopus sp ES04


iNaturalist
Na
e m
Thank you Robert Read for confirming the id of this species for us

Female ~26mm long.
Notice
1. the very 3 dimensional pronotum trailing edge.
2. Black hind shins.
3. Purple hind feet.
4. Black inner hind thighs, with orange an orange stripe along the bottem edge.
Imaged 1F in Nov
🔍Female, dorsal
🔍Female, profile
🔍Female, Pronotum, profile
🔍Female, Pronotum Edge, dorsal
🔍Female, Pronotum Edge, profile
🔍Female, Eye
🔍Female, Hind Leg & Abdomen
🔍Female, ventral
Yellow-winged Locust
Gastrimargus musicus


iNaturalist
Na
a
Thank you Robert Read & Matthew Connors for confirming the id of this species for us

Imaged 4(1J) in Feb(3:1J) & Mar(1)
Face
Profile
Dorsal
Hot Pink Rear Leg
Hindwing Colour
Forewing Venation
Released
Instar
Gumleaf Grasshopper
Goniaea australasiae


iNaturalist
Na
e m a f c
Thank you Matthew Connors & Anthony Paul for confirming the id of this species for us

Males ~28mm, females ~40-47mm long, with both exhibiting a variety of colour morphs.
A very high pronotum crest (median carina) which is not notch to any extent by the 3 lines (sulcus). If there is a notch it'll be small and in the 1st line (near the head).
Imaged 33(2M,3F,11J) in Jan(5:1J), Feb(4:1M,2F), Mar(4), Apr(2), May(1J), Aug(1J), Sep(1J), Oct(4:3J), Nov(2:1J) & Dec(9:1M,1F,3J)
Nymph
Nymph, profile
Nymph, dorsal
🔍Adult Profile
Adult Showing Wing
🔍Adult Colour Variation
Mimetic Gumleaf Grasshopper
Goniaea opomaloides


iNaturalist
Na
e m a r
SynonymGoniaea opomaloide

Thank you Robert Read & Matthew Connors for confirming the id of this species for us

Adult Males ~23-24mm, 5th Instar Female ~27mm, Adult Female ~35-43mm. Note that males have blue hind legs & females have "purple" hind legs. The 2 nymphs we've photographed have red to pink hind legs.
Smaller than other Gumleaf grasshoppers.
We thought some of these were G. volcans. When we quizzed Matthew on the notch in the 3 line (sulcus) on the pronotum on some of the specimens we photographed he said "G. opomaloides can have a notch there too but not always - the key feature is that the pronotum isn't arched at all (it's depressed here in fact which is a little weird)."
Interestingly we get deep red specimens in Jan, around the time the Senna Seed Pods are turning the same deep/burnt red. At other times of the year they are pale brown.
In Jan we found an instar (S14) which shed in the pot after we caught it; from 4th to 5th instar stage (you can tell by the size of the wing stubs). As we post process all images, and flip them so the head is always pointing to the left (makes comparison easier) the leg seems to be missing on different sides.
Imaged 17(4M,7F,3J) in Jan(2:1F,1J), Feb(1F), Mar(1F), Apr(3:1M,2F), May(4:1M,1F,1J), Sep(1J), Oct(2) & Dec(3:2M,1F)
🔍S4, Adult, dorsal
🔍S5, Adult Female, dorsal
🔍S6, Adult Female, dorsal, Purple Legs
🔍S13, Adult Male, dorsal
S3, Adult, profile
🔍S5, Adult Female, profile
🔍S7, Adult Female, profile
🔍S9, Adult, profile
🔍S10, Adult, profile
🔍S11, Adult Male, profile, Blue Legs
🔍S12, Adult Female, profile
🔍S13, Adult Male, profile, Legs Down
🔍S5, Adult Female, Pronotum, profile
🔍S5, Adult Female, Purple Inside Leg
🔍S5, Adult Female, posterior
🔍S5, Adult Female, Prosternal process
🔍S12, Adult Female, Pronotum, dorsal
🔍S12, Adult Female, Pronotum, profile
🔍S12, Adult Female, Face
🔍S12, Adult Female, Purple Inside Leg
🔍S12, Adult Female, Prosternal process
🔍S13, Adult Male, profile, Blue Legs Up
🔍S13, Adult Male, Blue Legs
🔍S13, Adult Male, Blue Abdomen
🔍S13, Adult Male, Orange Cheek Spot
🔍S13, Adult Male, Face
🔍S13, Adult Male, Prosternal process
🔍S8, Male Nymph, profile
🔍S8, Male Nymph, Red Inside Leg
🔍S14, Female, 4th Instar, dorsal
🔍S14, Female, 5th Instar, dorsal
🔍S14, Female,5th Instar, profile with leg
🔍S14, 5th Instar, profile without leg
🔍S14, Female, 5th Instar, Pink Rear Leg
🔍S14, Female, 5th Instar, Face
🔍S14, 5th Instar, Prosternal process
🔍S14, Female, 5th Instar, Ventral
False Gumleaf Grasshopper
Goniaeoidea sp


iNaturalist
Na
e m
Thank you Robert Read & Matthew Connors for confirming the id of this species for us

~33mm long.
Reddish wings contrast with grey body & off-white pronotum & head. Thru the damaged forwings, it looks like the hindwings are dark brown. Wings end with the abdomen.
Inside hind legs are black lined with dark red/maroon. They are remarkably plain coloured on the outside hinde legs. The rear tibia goes from green at the top thru blue to purple at the base, with purple feet.
Antennae are slightly wedge shaped, with slightly reddish-brown tips from halfway along.
Pronotum dorsally with very straight trailing edged triangle. Pronotoum has 3-4 strong sutures.
Imaged 1 in Feb
Dorsal, close up
Profile
Contrasting Colours
Pronotum in profile
Outside Rear Leg
Inside Rear Leg
Giant Crested Grasshopper
Macrolopholia sp


iNaturalist
Na
e m
Thank you Robert Read & Matthew Connors for confirming the id of this species for us

~40mm long Female (S4, the only one we've captured).
We've put a few different profile shots to highlight different aspects of the intricate shapes of this fascinating grasshopper.
Imaged 4(1F) in Mar(1), Oct(1F) & Nov(2)
S4, Female, dorsal
🔍S4, Female, profile
🔍S4, Female, profile
🔍S4, Female, profile
S4, Female, Head, dorsal
S4, Female, Head, profile
S4, Female, Face
S4, Female, Leg spines
S4, Female, ventral
Black-faced Macrotona
Macrotona australis


iNaturalist
Na
e m
Thank you Robert Read for confirming the id of this species for us

The black face separates this out from the Inland Grasshopper (M. securiformis) in the area. We found one of each species on Ellura on the same day.
Robert said "If it has a black face it is a male." He has photographed the female showing the Prosternal Process, that separates it from other macrotonas.
Imaged 1 in Jan
Dorsal
Ventral
Inland Macrotona
Macrotona securiformis


iNaturalist
Na
e m
Thank you Tony and Jenny Dominelli for confirming the id of this species for us

Females we found were ~24mm long; males ~16mm long.
These have a white face compared to M. australis.
Males are smaller, look very colourful and usually short-winged. Females are always fully winged, which hide their colours more. Both have lime-green bellies, as well as greenish stripes on the rear thighs, and red on the rear tibias.
Notice the white tips on the antennae, as well as on the palps.
Imaged 5(4M,1F) in Jan(1M), Feb(2:1M,1F), Mar(1M) & Jun(1M)
S3, Female, dorsal
S4, Male, dorsal
🔍S5, Male, dorsal
S1, Male, profile
S2, Male, profile
S3, Female, profile
S4, Male, profile, released
🔍S5, Male, profile
🔍S5, Male, profile, close up
S3, Female, Head, dorsal
S3, Female, Head, profile
🔍S5, Male, Forehead
S3, Female, anterior
S4, Male, anterior
S3, Female, Rear Leg
S4, Male, Rear Legs
🔍S5, Male, Rear Leg
S3, Female, posterior
S4, Male, posterior
🔍S5, Male, posterior
S3, Female, Abdomen, dorsal
S3, Female, Abdomen, ventral
🔍S5, Male, Antenna
🔍S5, Male, Prosternal Process
S1, Male, ventral
S4, Male, ventral
🔍S5, Male, ventral
Striped-cheek Macrotona
Macrotona sp


iNaturalist
Na
e m
Thank you Robert Read & Martin J Steinbauer for confirming the id of this species for us

~25mm long female. We originally confused this with Inland Macrotona (Macrotona securiformis). It's one of many undescribed Macrotonas.
1) The stripe on the cheek alerted us to it being different,
2) the forehead is grey, not white,
3) the rear leg stripes aren't solid black, but dappled/cross-hatched black,
4) the wing spotting is in different place,
5) the antenna are pale, but still with a white tip,
6) wood-grain eyes,
7) ventrally dull greenish, not bright lime-green,
8) abdomen, dorsally, not much red,
9) Blue tibias & feet.

Imaged 1F in Jan
🔍S1, Female, dorsal
🔍S1, Female, profile
🔍S1, Female, profile
🔍S1, Female, Forehead
🔍S1, Female, Rear Leg
🔍S1, Female, Inside Rear Leg
🔍S1, Female, Fastigium, dorsal
🔍S1, Female, Fastigium, profile
Western False Apotropis
Novum48 sp 3


iNaturalist
Na
r
Thank you Robert Read for confirming the id of this species for us

This is a known, but undescribed species called "Genus Novum 48 Species 3", shown in Rentz et al's book "A Guide to Australian Grasshoppers and Locusts"; page 167.
Notice the 2 different species, photographed on the same day, are different colour; the 2nd having a green tinge & the orange stripe being less well defined and paler.
Notice the purple antennae & feet.
Imaged 2 in Sep
🔍S1, dorsal
🔍S2, dorsal
🔍S1, profile
🔍S2, profile
Collared Pardillana
Pardillana limbata


iNaturalist
Na
e m
Thank you Matthew Connors for identifying and Robert Read for confirming the id of this species for us

Imaged 3 in Feb(1), Mar(1) & Apr(1)
Orange-winged Pardillana
Pardillana sp 11


iNaturalist
Na
e m
Thank you Matthew Connors for identifying and Ben Kurek for confirming the id of this species for us

The male was considerably smaller than the female @ ~25mm compared with ~38mm for the female.
Both have white tipped antennae. The female seemed slightly browner than the male, which was quite gray.
The female had obvious orange wings when she flew off; hence the common name.
Originally thought to be an unusually coloured Mimetic Gumleaf Grasshopper (Goniaea opomaloides).
Imaged 4(3M,1F) in Jan(1M), Feb(2:1M,1F) & Mar(1M)
🔍S1, Male
🔍S2, Male, dorsal
🔍S2, Male, profile
🔍S2, Male, Pronotum, profile
🔍S2, Male, Rear Leg Colour
🔍S2, Male, Antenna & Fastigium
🔍S2, Male, posterior
🔍S3, Female, profile
🔍S3, Female, Pronotum, profile
🔍S3, Female, Rear Leg Colour
🔍S3, Female, posterior
🔍S3, Female, Leg Colour, ventral
Wet-area Grasshopper
Perloccia evittata


iNaturalist
Na
a
Thank you Robert Read, Matthew Connors & Ben Kurek for confirming the id of this species for us

Similar to Kosciuscola sp, but as you can imagine from the name, they are an alpine species.
Was thought to be Praxibulus sp for a while, until we found Perloccia evittata in the book/grasshopper bible "A Guide to Australian Grasshoppers & Locusts".
They can be completely green, completely brown or a mix of green & brown as shown here.
Imaged 3(1J) in Oct(1J) & Nov(2)
Green Nymph
Green Adult Female
🔍Brown Adult, Pronotum
Brown Adult, Abdomen
Wingless Grasshopper
Phaulacridium vittatum


iNaturalist
Na
e m a
Thank you Matthew Connors & David Muirhead for confirming the id of this species for us

~17mm long
These two sightings are important to show both the colour & wing configuration of these grasshopper.
They have variable wing length & stripes can be missing.
Imaged 15(2M,2F) in Feb(7:1M,1F), Mar(4:1M,1F), Apr(2), May(1) & Sep(1)
🔍Mating
🔍Mating
Grassland Grasshopper
Pycnostictus seriatus


iNaturalist
Na
a
Thank you Matthew Connors for confirming the id of this species for us

Imaged 1 in Oct
Dorsal
Profile
Spotted Bandwing
Qualetta maculata


iNaturalist
Na
e m r
Thank you Matthew Connors for confirming the id of this species for us

They are known for their thick pronotum (shield on the back). It does vary though. The head is also quite distinctive being quite short but high, with the eyes protruding above the "forehead".
The abdomen is apricot in colour, and the pronotum has varying shades of white to grey.
Thanks to Matthew Connors for picking our miss-id of the nymph. We thought it was Cratilopus; you can see the pronotum shape is wrong for that genus, as well as Cratilopus being flightless.
Imaged 11(2M,2F,4J) in Jan(2), Mar(1J), Apr(1), Aug(1J), Sep(1:1M,1J), Oct(3:1F,1J), Nov(1M) & Dec(1F)
🔍S6, Early Instar, dorsal
🔍S9, 5th Instar, dorsal
🔍S11, Female Adult, dorsal
S4, Adult, profile
🔍S5, Adult, profile
S7, Adult, profile
🔍S9, 5th Instar, profile
🔍S11, Female Adult, profile
🔍S11, Female Adult, Face
🔍S11, Female Adult, Pronotum
🔍S11, Female Adult, Prosternal Process
Strong-horned Grasshopper
Retuspia validicornis


iNaturalist
Na
e m
Similar Species: Bark-mimicking Grasshopper (Coryphistes ruricola)
Thank you Robert Read & Matthew Connors for confirming the id of this species for us

This is the most southern record of this species we can find.
It's been hot and dry; we are into the 2nd year of a drought. Perhaps more Northerly species are progressing south.
This male was ~26mm long.
Very similar to the Bark-mimicking Grasshopper, we have shown a number of angles of the head to help show some of the differences between them.
Primarily the antennae are broader in perspective to the body, but eye patterns, fastigium shape, etc, all show differences when looking close up in details.
Imaged 1 in Nov
🔍Male, dorsal
🔍Male, profile
🔍Male, Antenna
🔍Male, Hind leg
Male, Fastigium
🔍Male, Fastigium
Male, Face
Male, Head
Male, ventral
Disappearing Grasshopper
Schizobothrus flavovittatus
Na
e m
~27mm, with very variable colours.
Imaged 2 in Feb(1) & Mar(1)
Dorsal
Profile
Ocelli
Rear Leg
Green Colour Form
Ventral
Crepitating Spurthroat
Scurra marmoralis
Na
e m r
Thank you Matthew Connors for identifying this species for us

We thought this was Halgania Grasshopper (Histrioacrida roseipennis), but for one thing the antennae are MUCH shorter with this species compared to H. roseoppenis.
Crepitate (in the common name) means to make a crackling sound.
Imaged 2 in Jan(1) & Feb(1)
Dorsal
Ventral
Blue-legged Hairy Grasshopper
Tapesta carneipes


iNaturalist
Na
m
Thank you Robert Read for confirming the id of this species for us

~14mm long
Imaged 1 in Aug
🔍Dorsal
🔍Profile
🔍Legs
🔍Fastigium
Hairy Grasshopper
Tapesta sp ES01


iNaturalist
Na
e m
Thank you Ethan Beaver for confirming the id of this species for us

Imaged 7(4J) in Jan(1), Mar(1), Jul(1J), Aug(2J), Oct(1J) & Dec(1)
🔍Adult
Salt & Pepper Grasshopper
Urnisa guttulosa


iNaturalist
Na
e m f
Other Common NameSalt and Pepper Grasshopper

Thank you Robert Read for identifying this species for us

A large specimen at ~32mm head tip to abdomen tail.
The "Posternal process" is also called "Throat Spur" in some species. But as noted here it's quite wide and flat, much less like a spur.
Imaged 4(1M,1F) in Apr(1M), Sep(1) & Nov(2:1F)
🔍Female, dorsal
🔍Female, profile
🔍Female, Pronotum
🔍Female, Fastigium
Female, Face
🔍Female, Antennae Colour
🔍Female, Purple Tibia & Feet
🔍Female, Posterior
🔍Female, Posternal process
🔍Female, Ventral
Red-legged Urnisa
Urnisa rugosa


iNaturalist
Na
e m
Thank you Matthew Connors for identifying and Robert Read for helping with the id of this species for us

After spending hours trying to separate out Urnisa species, we discovered there's an error with the habitus image on Rentz's Grasshoppers of Australia book, page 181.
We also chatted with Robert about this and he came up with some very useful insights which make it much easier. He translated the orginal description; it's all quite old and confusing as many species have been synonymised into the few we can get in SA now. Sumarised here for you to be able to refer back to easily:
Robert said "For the 3 SA species I would separate them as follows:
1. Pronotum with small tubercules, U. guttulosa
2. Pronotum with large tubercules close together, U. sp. 1
3. Pronotum rugose, U. rugosa"

As an aside, we've been considering the binomial name more as we learn more. We attempt to use it when creating common names for inverts where they don't exist yet. Robert translated the 2 described species in this genus:
guttulosa means "little drops", that is with small tubercules.
rugosa means "rough" or "wrinkled".
Imaged 6(1M,1F,1J) in Sep(2:1J) & Oct(4:1M,1F)
Dorsal
Camouflage but Purple Foot
Eastern Urnisa
Urnisa sp 1


iNaturalist
Na
e m
Thank you Matthew Connors for identifying and Robert Read for confirming the id of this species for us

This is an undescribed species, that is known about by the experts.
So it's in the Urnisa genus, and labelled "sp 1"; ie "species one".
When a species is formally described it gets a proper binomial name.
Imaged 9(7F,1J) in Sep(2:1F,1J), Oct(4F), Nov(1) & Dec(2F)
Adult, profile, Legs Up
Adult, profile, Legs Down
Adult, front
Adult, Back Legs & Feet
🔍Nymph, dorsal
Nymph, profile
Nymph, ventral
Sand Dune Grasshopper
Urnisiella rubropunctata


iNaturalist
Na
r
Other Common NameLong-legged Grasshopper

Thank you Matthew Connors for confirming the id of this species for us

Incredibly well hidden/camouflaged grasshopper.
All the legs are very long, particularly the middle pair.
It looked liked a spider at first. We coloured one photo to try and bring the grasshopper out more; but it's not how we saw it.
The nymph shown here is probably ~5th instar.
Imaged 2(1J) in Sep(1J) & Oct(1)
Adult, dorsal
🔍Nymph, dorsal
Adult, profile
🔍Adult, Camouflage
🔍Nymph, Camouflage
Adult, coloured
🔍Nymph, close up
Animals (Animalia) - Jointed Legs (Arthropoda) - Insects (Insecta) - Crickets, Grasshoppers & Katydids (Orthoptera) - Matchstick Grasshopper (Caelifera: Morabidae); 10 species, 8 from Ellura
Striped Matchstick Grasshopper
Morabinae sp ES01
Na
a
Imaged 2 in Mar(1) & Aug(1)
Short Antennae Matchstick Grasshopper
Morabinae sp ES02
Na
e m
Imaged 1 in Aug
🔍Mating
Mottled Matchstick Grasshopper
Morabinae sp ES03
Na
e m
Thanks to Matthew Connors for letting us know the only sub-family we get outside of rainforrests are Morabinae.
Imaged 1M in Feb
🔍
Bark-mimicking Matchstick Grasshopper
Morabinae sp ES04
Na
e m
Imaged 1 in Sep
White Matchstick Grasshopper
Morabinae sp ES05
Na
e m
Imaged 3 in Feb(2) & Mar(1)
Dorsal
🔍Profile, ~10mm
Articulation
Head
Quad Striped Matchstick Grasshopper
Morabinae sp ES08
Na
e m
Imaged 1 in Aug
Dorsal
🔍Profile
Eye
Pale Matchstick Grasshopper
Morabinae sp ES11
Na
e m
Imaged 2 in May(1) & Sep(1)
Dorsal
Anterior
Ventral
Mottled Matchstick Grasshopper
Prorifera sp ES01


iNaturalist
Na
e m
Thank you Dr Michael Kearney for identifying this species for us

1st Live Photo on-line:
Michael explained that both location and the number of antennal segments pointed to this genus.
Imaged 1M in Apr
Male, profile
Red Matchstick Grasshopper
Prorifera sp P11a


iNaturalist
Na
m
Thank you Dr Michael Kearney for identifying this species for us

These are often confused with Giant Green Slantface's, in photo's anyway. These are much smaller. The easy way to differentiate between them in photo's is that Matchstick Grasshoppers (sub-family Morabinae) have very short fat serrated antennae; mind you the antennae on this one is getting up there to make it confusing!
Michael said "All the matchstick grasshoppers were assigned a provisional ('P') species number by Ken Key so, even though they aren't formally described, they can be referred to. Prorifera contains 16, possibly 17 species, but only three have been described. P11a occurs in mallee and heathy veg either side of the SA/Vic border from around Nhill to Murray Bridge and from about Peebinga down to Naracoorte"
Imaged 1F in Apr
🔍Female
Travelled Matchstick Grasshopper
Vandiemenella viatica


iNaturalist
Na
e m c
Thank you Dr Michael Kearney for identifying this species for us

~25mm long. The number of segments on the antennae are diagnostic for this family.
Michael said "The other options would be Prorifera (which has more segments in the antennae) or Keyacris, but the species of the latter you get in that area would most likely be a more stocky species this."
In relation to S2, Michael said "This would be the western viatica 17 race".
It seems there are many races within this species, which are quite location dependant.
Imaged 2F in Jan(1F) & Oct(1F)
S1, Female, dorsal
S1, Female, profile
🔍S2, Female, profile
S1, Female, Antennae
S1, Female, Spiny Rear Legs
Animals (Animalia) - Jointed Legs (Arthropoda) - Insects (Insecta) - Crickets, Grasshoppers & Katydids (Orthoptera) - Gaudy Grasshopper (Caelifera: Pyrgomorphidae); 2 species, 1 from Ellura
Slant Face
Atractomorpha sp
Na
m
Other Common NamesCommon Grass Pyrgomorph, Green Grass Pyrgomorph or Vegetable Grasshopper

Imaged 1 in Mar
Nymph
Adelaide Pyrgomorph
Monistria discrepans


iNaturalist
Na
e m
Thank you Matthew Connors for identifying and David Muirhead for confirming the id of this species for us

Adult females we've measured are ~27-33mm, male ~17mm & juv' females ~16mm
While we worked out the genus years ago, Matthew id'ed them to species
He said "... Adelaide race. Oddly enough, about 1% of adults are fully-winged whereas the rest all have tiny wings like this." We've only seen flightless specimens. Later, Matthew also id'ed a couple of our juveniles as the same. We were thinking they might be Blistered Pyrgomorphs (M. pustulifera). They are quite similar and very variable. We've included shots of most speciemens to highlight differences & similarities. To help us sort them out he said "The pronotum isn't quite sculptured enough for M. pustulifera and the sides of the fastigium are convex rather than concave (although I'm not sure how variable these features are)" ... the fastigium is the spur on the top of the forehead ... "The key difference that should still be noticeable in nymphs is that the vertex (the section between the eyes) is raised above the eyes in M. pustulifera and is "flat or weakly convex" in M. discrepans." ... "I'm not sure how much the white rings vary in nymphs but in adult M. pustulifera even the ones on the side of the pronotum should have white rings". Thanks Matthew, very useful information that has allowed us to confirm all our specimens are the same species.
We have only ever found adult males with females. Otherwise we find adult & juveniles females on their own.
Robert has since said "Some M. discrepans also seem to have white around the spots", Comparing to M. pustulifera he said "Reliable differences are; Shape of head in profile. Shape of abdomen viewed from above. Rentz et al. state that it is pinched in M. discrepans, but so far we have not seen an image where this is visible."
Imaged 24(5M,17F,3J) in Jan(1J), Mar(5:4F,1J), Apr(3:1M,2F), May(4F), Jun(4:1M,3F), Jul(2:1M,1F) & Aug(5:2M,3F,1J)
S3, Female, dorsal
🔍S4, Female, dorsal
🔍S5&6, Pair, dorsal
S10, Female, dorsal
S14, Juvi Female, dorsal
🔍S17, Juvi Female, dorsal
🔍S7&8, Mating Pair, profile
S10, Female, profile
🔍S11, Female, profile
S12, Female, profile
🔍S13, Female, profile
🔍S15, Female, profile
🔍S14, Juvi Female, profile
🔍S16, Male, profile
S10, Female, Fastigium
S10, Female, Fastigium
S10, Female, close up
S14, Juvi Female, Face
S10, Female, ventral
S16, Male, ventral
S14, Juvi Female, ventral
Animals (Animalia) - Jointed Legs (Arthropoda) - Insects (Insecta) - Crickets, Grasshoppers & Katydids (Orthoptera) - Pygmy Grasshopper (Caelifera: Tetrigidae); 1 species from Ellura
Ellura's Pygmy Grasshopper
Cyphotettix ellurae


iNaturalist
Na
e m
Thank you Niko Kasalo, Dr Josip Skejo & Matthew Connors for identifying and Aidan Beutel for confirming the id of this species for us


   A new species named after Ellura !

1st Live Photo on-line, 1st Record on Atlas:

~5mm long Nymphs. ~5-8mm long Adults
At first we didn't know what this was, perhaps a Hemipteran bug? After reviewing photo's we realised it was a grasshopper. With a pronotum that covered the whole body we thought a wingless Rockhopper (Buforniina sp).
Thankfully there are experts out there willing to help with these unusual species.
It turned out to be a Pygmy Grasshopper Nymph!
Josip said "It could be either Tetrix irrupta, or maybe Cyphotettix sp. as Matthew suggested."
We became convinced we had a flightless species, and couldn't differentiate Nymphs from Adults. Josip sent us a link to a research paper he's published showing that, with flightless species, the only way to differentiate them is by a groove, or notch, just before the knee on top of the back legs. The top of the back leg is straight on nymphs (as can be seen here). It's very difficult to see in photographs.
Josip then tagged Niko Kasalo at Zagreb Uni, who recognised it as a new species. Niko is working with ANIC to describe this, and other Australian tetrigids.
They can be white, brown or black, striped or plain with most being brown, then black; white is rare.
We are of course jumping the gun here, it's not officially "Cyphotettix ellurae" until it's published, which won't happen until next year. But we are so excited & proud that he's going to name it after Ellura that we couldn't wait to share the news


These are facinating hoppers. The family is as old as dinosaurs. They even pre-date grass! Which makes the "Grasshopper" moniker somewhat deceiving. They actually eat fungi, moss, detritus, etc. Niko had some interesting, and very kind, things to say CLICK HERE

Imaged 20(7M,11F,8J) in Jan(1J), May(6:4M,2F,2J), Jun(6:2M,4F,3J), Jul(3:1M,2F,1J), Aug(2:1F) & Oct(2:2F,1J)
🔍S2, Male Nymph, dorsal
🔍S4, Female Nymph, dorsal
🔍S8, Female Adult, dorsal
🔍S13, Female Adult, dorsal
S1, Male Nymph, profile
🔍S2, Male Nymph, profile
🔍S4, Female Nymph, profile
🔍S9, Male Nymph, profile
🔍S10, Female Adult, profile
🔍S11, Male Nymph, profile
🔍S12, Male Adult, profile
🔍S13, Female Adult, profile
🔍S16, Female Adult, profile
S1, Male Nymph, Face
🔍S13, Female Adult, Face
S1, Male Nymph, Fastigium
S3, Male Nymph, Fastigium
S13, Female Adult, Fastigium
🔍S18, Male, Fastigium
S1, Male Nymph, Pronotum
🔍S16, Female Adult, Leg Notch
🔍S17, Female Adult, Leg Notch
🔍S5, Female Nymph, Perspective
S17, Female Adult, Mite
S1, Male Nymph, posterior
🔍S12, Male Adult Male, posterior
🔍S16, Female Adult, posterior
🔍S13, Female Adult, ventral
Animals (Animalia) - Jointed Legs (Arthropoda) - Insects (Insecta) - Crickets, Grasshoppers & Katydids (Orthoptera) - Leaf-rolling Cricket (Gryllacrididae); 3 species from Ellura
Dark Raspy Cricket
Craspedogryllacris atrofrons


iNaturalist
Na
e m
Thank you Dr Paul Whitington for identifying and Matthew Connors & Frances (CicadaExplorer) for confirming the id of this species for us

1st Live Photo on-line
1st Record on Atlas

Males ~24-25mm, while the female adult S11 was considerably larger at ~35 (excluding ovipositor). S9 (adult female) was ~28mm. S3 Male antennae length was 45mm, S11 Female ovi-positor length ~35mm, while S9's was only ~29mm.
S3 was the first adult we caught, and it was very sick. Could have been a spider bite, dehydration, etc. At first, we thought it was at it's end of life, but after giving it a drink and keeping it in a container all day it's vitality returned, so we released it.
A reddish brown face (black at some angles) with a white spot between the eyes and two oblong white patches above the antenna base.
Their front legs have two vertical rows of strong spines to catch & hold prey. We were surprised that it was aggressive! David Rentz suggests they are ferocious. We heard it "rasping" it's wings but a video couldn't pick up the sound, it's too quiet.
They are also called Leaf-rolling Crickets because they can produce webbing from their mouths to wrap a leaf up to hide in. Very similar to Leaf-curling spiders.
Even more surprising is that it's wing venation is different from one side to the other. We found this on another specimen, so wing venation isn't diagnostic here (unless we have a number of different species). They can also have asymmetric genetalia - possibly can even have male & female genitalia.
We can't be sure they are all the same species, but since the features look to match up (spots on the face, etc) it's a reasonable assumption.
Notice, on the female nymphs, the ovi-positor curls up over the abdomen to keep out the way while growing; and gets longer with each instar.
Through other miss-id'ed images, we thought this might be Apotrechus sp, but Matthew said "Apotrechus are completely wingless and lack dark markings on the face"
S2 = Female Early Instar
S3 = Male Adult
S4 = Male Adult
S6 = Male Adult
S7 = Female Final Instar
S11 = Female Adult
Imaged 12(6M,5F,2J) in Jan(2:1M,1F), Mar(1F), Oct(4:3M,1F,1J), Nov(4:1M,2F,1J,1E) & Dec(1M)
S2, dorsal
S3, dorsal
🔍S3, dorsal, Wings Open
S4, dorsal
S6, dorsal
🔍S7, dorsal
S2, profile, front
S2, profile, back
S3, profile
🔍S3, profile, Wings Up
S4, profile
S5, profile, Wings Up
S6, profile
🔍S11, profile
🔍S11, Palps
S2, Wing Buds
S3, Right Wing Venation
S3, Left Wing Venation
S6, Wing Venation
🔍S7, Wing Buds
🔍S11, Wing Venation
S2, Face
S6, Face
🔍S11, Face
S2, Head & Spiracle
S3, Antenna
S3, Pronotum in profile
S3, Aggressive Stance
S2, Front Leg & Foot
S2, Middle leg & foot
S6, Leg Spines
S3, posterior, profile
S3, Cerci
🔍S11, Cerci
S6, ventral
🔍S11, ventral
Black Raspy Cricket
Hadrogryllacris sp ES01


iNaturalist
Na
e m
Thank you Matthew Connors for confirming the id of this species for us

~27mm long nymph (female, 5th/final instar) with antennae a whopping nearly 80mm
Very little is published on Australian raspy crickets. Here we have gone to species because of colour; no other raspy crickets are black (that we are aware of).
Notice here the ovi-positor curling up and over the abdomen. We think this straightens out in the adult.
In his cricket book, Rentz says Raspy Crickets are closer to Katydids than True Crickets, but unfortunately doesn't cover them in either his Cricket nor Katydid books.
Imaged 1(1F,1J) in Jan
🔍Dorsal
🔍Profile
🔍Antennae
🔍Face
🔍Middle Leg
🔍Iso-view
🔍Ventral
Pale Raspy Cricket
Paragryllacris sp


iNaturalist
Na
e m
Thank you Dr Paul Whitington for identifying this species for us

~23mm long Male.
Notice the rear end is quite different to Craspedogryllacris sp. There is also the obvious difference of the different coloured head, but colour is often not a good diagnostic tool when it comes to inverts.
Notice how the spines on the front leg are so hairy. While not clear in the above photo's, Craspedogryllacris sp exhibits the same morphology.
Paul said "I reckon this fits the description of this genus in Rentz and John 1990 pretty well. Here are some of the features that I think are evident in your photos.
  • fastigium of vertex strongly carinate (#1)
  • antennal scape with a very prominent swelling on internal margin (#2)
  • pronotum relatively strongly sulcate (marked with grooves, #4)
  • fore coxa with a prominent spine (#4)
  • fully winged
  • fore and middle tibiae with 5 elongate spines on each margin of ventral surface, apical spine minute, much more robust than those preceding (#1-5)
  • hind tibia armed dorsally with many elongate spines or few minute tubercles (#4)
  • hind femur with 1-4 robust teeth on outer margin of ventral surface, these positioned near apex, internal margin with 0-2 much smaller teeth, usually at apex, but may be positioned along entire apical half (#7 shows 4 teeth on outer margin, but 7 on inner margin, rather than 0-2)
  • male tergite IX terminating abruptly but not bulbate in profile, lateral angles produced and dentate (#7)
  • intercercal teeth small, divergent, widely separated but positioned internally relative to base of cercus (#7).

Imaged 1M in Oct
🔍S1, Male, dorsal
🔍S1, Male, profile
🔍S1, Male, Legs
🔍S1, Male, Front Leg
🔍S1, Male, anterior
🔍S1, Male, posterior
🔍S1, Male, ventral
Animals (Animalia) - Jointed Legs (Arthropoda) - Insects (Insecta) - Crickets, Grasshoppers & Katydids (Orthoptera) - True Cricket (Grylloidea: Gryllidae); 4 species, 3 from Ellura
Mottled Bush Cricket
Eurepa marginipennis


iNaturalist
Na
e m
Thank you Prof Tony Robillard & Tony and Jenny Dominelli for confirming the id of this species for us

Imaged 25(12M,12F,11J) in Jan(4:2M,2F), Mar(1:1M,1J), Apr(2:1M,1F,1J), May(1F), Aug(1:1M,1J), Sep(1:1F,1J), Oct(5:1M,3F,1J), Nov(5:2M,3F,4J) & Dec(5:4M,1F,2J)
Adult Male, dorsal, ~14mm
Adult Male, profile
Adult Male, Head, profile
Adult Male, ventral
Male Nymph, dorsal, ~12mm
Male Nymph, profile
Male Nymph, anterior
Male Nymph, Cleaning Antenna
Male Nymph, Antenna
Male Nymph, Rear Leg
Male Nymph, ventral
S1, Female Nymph, dorsal
S1, Female Nymph, profile
S3, Female Nymph, dorsal, ~11mm
S3, Female Nymph, profile
S3, Female Nymph, anterior
S3, Female Nymph, Shoulder
🔍S4, Female Nymph, dorsal, ~14mm
S4, Female Nymph, anterior
Brown Bush Cricket
Lepidogryllus comparatus


iNaturalist
Na
e m a
Thank you Matthew Connors for confirming the id of this species for us

Males & Females are ~18mm long (body & head), with antennae that are longer than the body.
Females have a long ovi-positor which is partially concealed by the hind wing tips. As such, males which also have the same rolled/pointed hindwing tips look quite similar.
Males have a very different wing venation to females.
Can be differentiated from Black Bush Crickets by the streak marks on the head and pale legs.
Matthew said "Yep looks good to me! L. comparatus and L. parvulus are outwardly identical but I am not aware of any L. parvulus records from SA so I think you are good with L. comparatus. If you really want to be sure, you can count the teeth on the stridulatory file - ~108-143 in L. comparatus and ~97-128 in L. parvulus. The call of the male is the only truly reliable way to tell them apart".
On a different observation Matthew said " L. parvulus has a much faster call (~5 chirps per second) than L. comparatus."
Imaged 7(3M,4F) in Jan(2:1M,1F), Feb(2:1M,1F), Mar(1F), Nov(1F) & Dec(1M)
🔍S4, Adult Male, dorsal
🔍S5, Adult Female, dorsal
🔍S7, Adult Female, dorsal
🔍S4, Adult Male, profile
🔍S5, Adult Female, profile
🔍S7, Adult Female, profile
🔍S4, Adult Male, close up
🔍S5, Adult Female, close up
🔍S7, Adult Female, close up
🔍S6, Adult Male, Face
🔍S7, Adult Female, Face
🔍S7, Adult Female, Head
🔍S7, Adult Female, Mouth Parts, ventral
🔍S7, Adult Female, Wing Venation
🔍S5, Adult Female, Rolled Hind Wings
🔍S7, Adult Female, Rear Leg
🔍S5, Adult Female, ventral
🔍S7, Adult Female, ventral
Lined Ground Cricket
Salmanites sp


iNaturalist
Na
e m
Thank you Matthew Connors & Prof Tony Robillard for confirming the id of this species for us

~10mm long female (head+body), with her ovipositor twice that at ~20mm.
A small dark cricket with a heringbone like pattern on her back.
We assume she's an adult by the length of her ovi-positor, which shows she is wingless and therefore flightless; not unusual with crickets.
Typically considered a Northern Australia genera, it seems they also inhabit the dry regions to the South.
Tony suggests "that it is probably new"; ie an undescribed species. This also means that the genus level id could be changed once/if it's described.
Imaged 3(1M,2F,2J) in Jan(1:1M,1J), Feb(1:1F,1J) & May(1F)
🔍Female, dorsal
🔍Female, profile
🔍Female, Face
🔍Female, anterior
Black Bush Cricket
Teleogryllus commodus


iNaturalist
Na
m a
Other Common NamesBush Cricket or Black Field Cricket

Thank you Asimakis Patitsas for confirming the id of this species for us

Imaged 2F in Feb(1F) & Mar(1F)
🔍Female
Animals (Animalia) - Jointed Legs (Arthropoda) - Insects (Insecta) - Crickets, Grasshoppers & Katydids (Orthoptera) - Scaled Cricket (Grylloidea: Mogoplistidae); 1 species from Ellura
Wandella Ornebius
Ornebius sp


iNaturalist
Na
e m
Thank you Matthew Connors & David Muirhead for confirming the id of this species for us

Only ~7-8mm long, it's a very flat, wingless species, with an extended "nose". The male has much longer antennae (slightly longer than it's head & body) than the females (about half head & body length). The antennae on both genders are banded, basically brown with small, unevenly spaced, black bands. Ovipositor is ~3mm long.
Listed as Northern Australia location but Adelaide Uni found some in SA back in the 1950's.
Imaged 4(1M,2F) in Mar(1M), Apr(2:1F) & Jul(1F)
🔍Female, dorsal
🔍Male, dorsal
🔍Female, profile
🔍Female, Face
Animals (Animalia) - Jointed Legs (Arthropoda) - Insects (Insecta) - Crickets, Grasshoppers & Katydids (Orthoptera) - Spider Cricket (Grylloidea: Phalangopsidae); 1 species from Ellura
Spider Cricket
Endacusta australis


iNaturalist
Na
e m
Thank you Matthew Connors for identifying and Reiner Richter for confirming the id of this species for us

Not a lot is known of our Australian crickets. Like so many inverts, genital examination is often required to get below genus level to species.
They love our carport, so often see them on the walls. Recently we noticed a couple shedding/moulting, and discovered that they eat their exuviae (disgarded exoskeleton). This is an excellent adaption to save precious resources. They use gravity to "fall" out of their old exoskeleton, but we've rotated a couple of the images to show more detail; as well as leaving one vertically to see the correct orientation.
We have made some assumptions here: 1. Female age is based on the length of ovipositor. 2. Females are wingless. 3. Adults males of this genera don't seem to have full length wings.
We can't be sure all the specimens here are the same species. But they do look very similar and most were found in the same area.
Imaged 33(17M,12F,14J) in Jan(9:3M,2F,4J), Feb(4:1M,3F,3J), Mar(7:4M,3F), Apr(2:1M,1F), May(3:1M,2F), Nov(2:2M,2J) & Dec(6:5M,1F,5J)
Adult Female, dorsal, ~18mm
Adult Female, profile
Adult Female, close up
Adult Female, anterior
Adult Female, Rear Leg
Adult Male, dorsal, ~12mm
Adult Male, profile
Adult Male, close up
Adult Male, anterior
Immature Female, dorsal, ~10mm
Immature Female, close up
🔍Rotated, Male, Just Shed with Exuviae
🔍Rotated, Juvi Fem, Eating it's Exuviae
🔍Juvi Fem, Eating it's Exuviae
Animals (Animalia) - Jointed Legs (Arthropoda) - Insects (Insecta) - Crickets, Grasshoppers & Katydids (Orthoptera) - Pygmy Cricket (Grylloidea: Trigonidiidae); 3 species from Ellura
Ottes Pygmy Cricket
Calperum ottei


iNaturalist
Na
e m
Thank you Matthew Connors & David Muirhead for confirming the id of this species for us

1st Live Photo on-line:
Mottled reddish brown crickets with a couple of dark abdominal bands and 2 diagnostic central pale dorsal spots. They have a distinctive horizontal black band covering the lower half of their face; which carries through their eyes.
Her ovi-positor sheaths have finely serrated tips; possibly the reason for the families other common name of "Sword-tail" Crickets.
Females are ~5-6mm, with ovipositor ~3-4mm. We didn't measure our male but according to our source "A guide to Crickets of Australia" by Rentz & Su, males are slightly smaller.
Both genders are wingless.
These are well known in the Murray Mallee, and are often found with Mallee Dwarf Cricket (Territirritia tya) in larger quantities; which we've also experienced.
Given they are a winter species, the January sighting is strange; it was a hot, wet summer.
Imaged 3(1M,2F) in Jan(1M), Jul(1F) & Aug(1F)
🔍S2, Female, dorsal
🔍S3, Female, dorsal
🔍S1, Male, dorsal
🔍S2, Female, profile
🔍S2, Female, face
Confusing Pygmy Cricket
Pteronemobius truncatus


iNaturalist
Na
e m
Thank you Matthew Connors for confirming the id of this species for us

Our first winged pygmy cricket. We found 2 dead females, on the same day in February. While we prefer to use live specimens, we also use dead ones until we find live ones to publish. Unfortunately we didn't realise the insect pots were full of moth scales, so got these covered ruining the quality of the diagnostic we can gather.
Body & head ~6 mm, with ovipositor at just over 2mm.
These are found in the Murray Mallee, but few records can be found on-line.
Imaged 2F in Feb
🔍S2, Female, dorsal
🔍S1, Female, profile
Mallee Dwarf Cricket
Territirritia tya


iNaturalist
Na
e m
Thank you Matthew Connors for confirming the id of this species for us

1st Live Photo on-line:
Very dark crickets with few markings; males are black while females are dark brown. They have not discernable face markings, which is unusual for crickets.
The females have small pale pairs of spots on their backs (not always visible). Her ovi-positor sheaths have serrated tips.
Females are ~6mm, with ovipositor ~3-4mm, while our male was ~4mm.
Both genders are wingless.
These are well known in the Murray Mallee, and are often found with Ottes Pygmy Cricket (Calperum ottei) in smaller quantities; which we've also experienced.
Imaged 7(1M,6F) in Jun(1F), Jul(4:1M,3F) & Aug(2F)
🔍Female, dorsal
🔍Female, profile
🔍Female, Ovipositor
🔍Male, dorsal
🔍Male, perspective on little finger
Animals (Animalia) - Jointed Legs (Arthropoda) - Insects (Insecta) - Crickets, Grasshoppers & Katydids (Orthoptera) - Mole Cricket (Gryllotalpidae); 2 species, 1 from Ellura
Australian Mole Cricket
Gryllotalpa australis


iNaturalist
Na
a
Thank you Matthew Connors & Thomas Mesaglio for confirming the id of this species for us

~28mm long (head & body)
The diagnostic black colouration of the wing is not visible at all angles.
The two dimples on the pronotum don't seem to be mentioned anywhere, but both specimens photographed have them
The ocelli look defunct (brown rather than black)?
Had them in our lawn in Lobethal. They were so loud at certain times of the year we couldn't sit under our verandah.
There are very few sightings of these (even less in SA), but that's probably because they live underground. But when you do see them, such prehistoric animals!
Imaged 2 in Mar
🔍S1, Male, dorsal
S1, Male, profile
🔍S2, Male, profile
S1, Male, Wing Venation
🔍S1, Male, Claws
🔍S1, Male, Ocelli
🔍S1, Male, Pronotum Dimples
🔍S1, Male, Mandibles
The Confusing Mole Cricket
Gryllotalpa coarctata


iNaturalist
Na
e m
Thank you Thaddeus Charles Jones for confirming the id of this species for us

1st Record in SA on Atlas:
~31mm long.
It has hairy antennae, and is fact relatively furry.
Notice the powerful front claws for digging dirt & making tunnels. The rear legs have long spines for moving the loose dirt back.
Imaged 1M in Dec
🔍Male, dorsal
🔍Male, profile
🔍Male, Face
🔍Male, Front Leg, front
🔍Male, Front Leg, rear
🔍Male, Rear Leg, under
🔍Male, ventral
Animals (Animalia) - Jointed Legs (Arthropoda) - Insects (Insecta) - Crickets, Grasshoppers & Katydids (Orthoptera) - Katydid (Tettigoniidae); 8 species, 7 from Ellura
Bush Katydid
Caedicia simplex


iNaturalist
Na
e m a
Other Common NameCommon Garden Katydid

Similar Species: Gumleaf Katydid (Torbia viridissima)
Thank you Stephen Fricker for confirming the id of this species for us

~25mm long.
Females have a shortish, but visible, ovi-positor.
Colours seem variable, with pure green like here, or with red highlights similar to our adult Torbia viridissima.
Very hard to distinguish from Torbia sp. We've used the wing venation in relation to the leading edge as our guide. With these, the leading edge curves in, near the main vein, near the tip of the wing. With Torbia, it's leading edge is straighter, so apears further from the main vein. The legs of Torbia are also longer, so the rear thigh extends well past the end of the body. Where as here, with Caedicia, the knee is close to the end of the body. This is difficult to see as soon as there's any angle on the camera shot.
Imaged 4(2M,1F,1J) in Jan(2M), Mar(1F) & Dec(1J)
🔍S1 Male, dorsal
🔍S1 Male, profile
🔍S1 Male, face
🔍S1 Male, pronotum
🔍S2 Male, Abdomen Colours
Spotted Predatory Katydid
Chlorobalius leucoviridis


iNaturalist
Na
e m
Thank you Matthew Connors for confirming the id of this species for us

~33mm long (head & body) female. The antennae, legs, wings and ovi-positor extend much further.
Notic how the spots camouflage perfectly with Melaleuca lanceolata buds.
Notice the large number of spines, 4 sided on the middle & rear tibia. Paired on the front tibia. They are white, with black tips, & paired on the ventral side of all 6 femurs.
One female specimen found in Melaleuca lanceolata in Feb.
Imaged 2 in Feb(1) & Apr(1)
🔍S1, Female, dorsal
🔍S1, Female, profile
🔍S1, Female, profile, closer
🔍S1, Female, profile, Squatting
🔍S1, Female, Abdomenal Colours
🔍S1, Female, Wing Venation
🔍S1, Female, Cerci
🔍S1, Female, anterior
🔍S1, Female, Camouflage
🔍S1, Female, ventral
Upolu Grass Katydid
Conocephalus upoluensis


iNaturalist
Na
e m
Thank you Matthew Connors for confirming the id of this species for us

~15mm long, wingspan ~43mm & antennae ~33mm. At rest the wings extend well past the body.
Variable in colour, they can also be green.
This one was very pale, off white with a green tinge; the brown back wasn't very noticeable with the eye.
Large head & eyes compared with body which makes us suspect it's nocturnal.
Forewings are shorter than hindwings. The wing area near the body is quite strange & distinctive; having a 'ridge' between 2 'dips'; very cricket like.
The anal spurs are diagnostic with these (their shape & location)
Imaged 1M in Dec
Male, dorsal
Male, profile
Male, Wing Base
Male, Short Forewings
Male, Anal Spurs, posterior
Male, Anal Spurs, ventral
Mottled Katydid
Ephippitytha maculata


iNaturalist
Na
a
SynonymEphippitytha quadrigesimaguttata

Other Common Name32-Spotted Katydid

Thank you Matthew Connors for identifying and Dianne Clarke for confirming the id of this species for us

We thought this was E. trigintiduoguttata. Matthew is working on them and it's a bit up in the air at this stage if they are the same species/synonyms or different. Another possible synonym, or perhaps different is E. maculata
Imaged 1 in Apr
Male, profile
Calperum Gumleaf Katydid
Terpandrus calperum


iNaturalist
Na
e m r
Thank you Robert Read for confirming the id of this species for us

~25mm long
Note the black knees and 6 projections under the body.
Location suggests this species and it doesn't match the photo in Rentz's Katydid book of T.splendidus.
But there's precious little info on how to separate out the species.
Imaged 3(3F,3J) in Oct(1:1F,1J), Nov(1:1F,1J) & Dec(1:1F,1J)
🔍S2,Female Nymph, dorsal
🔍S1,Female Nymph, profile
🔍S2,Female Nymph, profile
🔍S2,Female Nymph, Back
🔍S2,Female Nymph, Face
🔍S2,Female Nymph, Mouth
🔍S2,Female Nymph, Head, profile
🔍S2,Female Nymph, 6 Projections
🔍S2,Female Nymph, Black Knees
🔍S2,Female Nymph, Cerci
S1,Female Nymph, Released, camouflage
🔍S2,Female Nymph, ventral
Bush Katydid
Tinzeda cf sp
Na
e m a
You can see a pale line which appears to be a ridge above the abdomen behind the pronotum. With the male it's pink, white in the female. This are actually the edges of the forming hind wings. The anterior shot of the male highlights this quite well.
There is also a very pale, broken line underneath the abdomen.
These specimens were caught on the same day. Both were ~18mm long.
The female has a very knife like, curved, ovipositor.
Imaged 13(7M,4F,10J) in Feb(1F), Aug(3:3M,3J), Sep(6:3M,3F,6J), Oct(2:1M,1J) & Nov(1)
Female Nymph, dorsal
Female Nymph, profile
Female Nymph, antenna
Female Nymph, ventral
Male Nymph, dorsal
Male Nymph, profile
Male Nymph, anterior
Male Nymph, ridge
Male Nymph, ventral
Southern Bush Katydid
Tinzeda sororoides


iNaturalist
Na
e m
Thank you Matthew Connors for confirming the id of this species for us

1st Live Photo on-line
1st Record in SA & 2nd in Australia on Atlas
:
Notice the diagnostic black spots along the top edge of the upper white wing stripe.
Imaged 6(5M,1F) in Oct(2M), Nov(3M) & Dec(1F)
🔍S1, Male, dorsal
🔍S3, Female, dorsal
🔍S6, Male, dorsal
🔍S1, Male, profile
🔍S3, Female, profile
🔍S6, Male, profile
🔍S3, Female, iso view
🔍S1, Male, Head
🔍S1, Male, Mouth
🔍S3, Female, Fastigium, profile
🔍S3, Female, Fastigium, dorsal
🔍S6, Male, Wings, dorsal
🔍S3, Female, Black Wing Spots
🔍S1, Male, posterior
🔍S3, Female, Sawtoothed Ovi-positor
🔍S1, Male, ventral
Gumleaf Katydid
Torbia viridissima


iNaturalist
Na
e m a
Similar Species: Bush Katydid (Caedicia simplex)
Thank you Matt Campbell & Matthew Connors for confirming the id of this species for us

Adult Male, ~28mm long.
Now that we have both Torbia & Caedicia here we can't be sure which genus the nymphs belong to. See our Caedicia observation for a discussion of differences.
Imaged 4(1M,3J) in Feb(1J), Mar(1M), Oct(1J) & Nov(1J)
S3, Young Nymph
S1, Late Instar, profile
S1, Late Instar, dorsal
🔍S4, Adult Male, dorsal
🔍S4, Adult Male, profile
🔍S4, Adult Male, Long Rear Thigh

Copyright © 1996-2024 Brett & Marie Smith. All Rights Reserved.
End of Page